|
Post by penguinsgm on Aug 18, 2009 9:54:18 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure that any contracts offered to Gaborik must be more than 1 year. This is based on the Lecavalier ruling from last year.
|
|
|
Post by coloradogm on Aug 18, 2009 10:49:14 GMT -5
I think Pitt is correct.
|
|
|
Post by Rubber_Duck on Aug 18, 2009 11:28:22 GMT -5
I remember something similar as well
|
|
|
Post by Bryce - Minny on Aug 18, 2009 12:35:58 GMT -5
Geez you would think the founder of the league would know the rules :-)
Bid adjusted, legally to show new offer on two year deal
|
|
|
Post by FincanSJGM on Aug 18, 2009 13:22:03 GMT -5
Is it only two? I thought it was established as 3 (dont have time to review the rules right now while at work)
|
|
|
Post by penguinsgm on Aug 18, 2009 13:59:22 GMT -5
It may have been established to have the duration which will make him a UFA at contract end, but I don't fully remember...
|
|
|
Post by coloradogm on Aug 18, 2009 14:23:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by starsgenman on Aug 18, 2009 15:35:12 GMT -5
If it's 3 years basically Caps have won the Gaborik sweepstakes IMO
|
|